Pass on to those in your address book.She is one DANGEROUS person, as is her husband!
According to Snopes.com,   Princeton  was requested to put a "restriction" on distribution of any copies of the thesis of Michelle Obama (a/k/a/ Michelle laVaughn Robinson) saying it could not be made available until November 5, 2008 but when it was published on a political website they decided they would  lift the restriction.
Subj: Thesis - Michele Obama aka Michelle LaVaughn Robinson
OBAMA'S MILITANT RACISM REVEALED
            &nb sp;           
 
In her senior thesis at Princeton, Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on "crime and hatred". Moreover, she stated that whites in America were "ineradicably racist".   The 1985 thesis, titled "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community" was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson.
Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to "Whites at Princeton , it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first..." However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, "If those "Whites at Princeton " really saw Michelle as one who always would "be Black first," it seems that she gave them that impression".
Most alarming is Michele Obama's use of the terms "separationist" and "integrationist" when describing the views of black people.
Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a "separationist" view of race.
"By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight."
Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her "further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant."
 
Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder.
Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America , but she elevates black over white in her world.
            &nb sp;          
 
Here is another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning:
"There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost. "
What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she's first lady that will elevate black over white in America ?
The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.
"Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments."
            &nb sp;                     
The conclusion of her thesis is alarming.
Michelle Obama's poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. "I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility."
 
Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input.
 
Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another.
 
The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama's thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism.
 
This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.
            &nb sp;            
Michelle Obama's intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern
 
Now maybe she's changed, but she sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously racist comment about American whites?  I am sure that it will.
PS: We paid for her scholarship.

Tags: Michelle Obama Politics

2 comments View Entry

'Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by
Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001?  

Were people from all over the world, mostly Americans, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac
From our nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania ?  

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or 
Crushing death that day, or didn't they?  

And I'm supposed to care that a copy of the Koran was 'desecrated' when
An overworked American soldier kicked it or got it wet?..Well, I don't.

I don't care at all. 

I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.  

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere possession of which is a crime in Saudi Arabia 

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat. 

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Iraq come out
And fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques.  

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.  

I'll care when the American media stops pretending that their First Amendment
Liberties are somehow derived from international law instead of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights.  

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a brave marine roughing up an Iraqi terrorist to obtain information, know this:

I don't care  

When I see a fuzzy photo of a pile of naked Iraqi prisoners who have been humiliated in what amounts to a college-hazing incident, rest assured:

I don't care.   

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move
Because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank:

I don't care.  

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed 'special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:

I don't care.  

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and 
Other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn and-you guessed it-

I don't care !!   

If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends. Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behavior!  

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country! And may I add:  

'Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem' -- Ronald Reagan 

I have another quote that I would like to add AND.....I hope you forward all this.  

'If we ever forget that we're One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under.' Also by.. Ronald Reagan  

One last thought for the day:  

In case we find ourselves starting to believe all the Anti-American sentiment and negativity, we should remember England 's Prime Minister Tony Blair's words during a recent interview. When asked by

One of his Parliament members why he believes so much in America , he said: 'A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in.. And how many want out.'   

Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:

1. Jesus Christ 
2. The American G. I.  

One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.   

YOU MIGHT WANT TO PASS THIS ON,  AS MANY SEEM TO FORGET BOTH OF THEM. 

AMEN!

1 comments View Entry

We should all stand together on issues of freedom. I was glad to hear of the Supreme Court decision. We have a long way to go in MA, but hopefully this will open up some doors.

I'm hoping to see some of these laws changed:

A) Not letting town CLEO (Town PD Chief) decide in a convoluted way who gets a Class A LTC. It should be Statewide Licensing. This is definately the most convoluted law we have, it is unconstitutional that someone in my town can own any gun, and someone out by Boston cannot.

B) All pistols should be allowed to be bought here! Why can't I buy a new Glock (or any other handgun not on EOPS) yet an LEO can buy one. The whole intention of the dumb so called consumer protection law is that the Glock is not safe, yet they are letting town PD's use it as a duty gun? Meanwhile used Pre 98 Glocks here are skyrocketing in price up to 800 for some models, where in NH you can buy a NIB one for 400....so much for consumer protections.....

C) Lastly but not least is the Assault Weapons Ban, for those of you that did not know, it's still on the books in MA. You cannot buy a Hicap Mag manufactured after 94 legally. If you do there is hefty fine and jail time. Go over to any other state in the union and you can buy them, over the counter....but cannot bring them into MA. Stupid.

D) Class A, Class B....just dumb, you are a law abiding gun owner and are responsible enough for a pistol with ten rounds, but can't have a pistol with 10+....dumb.

Join GOAL, Join the NRA, write your Leaders....STAND TOGETHER for freedom!

Thanks for listening, even if you aren't a gun owner, remember stand with them, and support induvidual rights, because when they take the guns the bows, and hunting rights will be next.... AND THEN THIS COUNTRY CAN SLOWLY BECOME A COMMUNIST COUNTRY!

0 comments View Entry

Vote NO on Measure 2

Measure 2, an ill-conceived ballot measure that would ban aerial predator control practices and severely damage the Alaska Board of Game's efforts to boost low moose and caribou populations will be voted on during the primary election on August 26.

Alaskans for Professional Wildlife Management will be waging a campaign to defeat Measure 2 because we understand the importance of maintaining healthy predator-prey relationships in order to guarantee the survival of all of our native species. Alaskan conservationists are pleased this measure will be on the ballot, as it will provide Alaskans an opportunity to be heard regarding the importance of preserving critical wildlife populations.

Measure 2 is supported by outside animal rights extremists, like Defenders of Wildlife, as a first step towards their larger agenda of banning all hunting. As sportsmen, we are dedicated to preserving Alaska's native wildlife by utilizing the most effective game management tools available and stopping these extremists from hijacking Alaska's wildlife management policies.

Moose and caribou are critically important culturally and nutritionally to Alaskans, Natives and subsistence hunters, as well as being integral to the overall ecosystem. Unfortunately, overcrowded wolf and predator populations are decimating the number of moose, caribou and other important wildlife in certain areas, resulting in more than 80% of all moose and caribou deaths in an average year. If we allow these outside groups to ban aerial predator control, Alaska's moose and caribou populations will continue to suffer.

Join APWM to help defeat Measure 2 on August 26!

0 comments View Entry

Animal rights groups are pushing our legislators now more than ever to further their cause of total animal liberation. Animal rights groups such as People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Humane Society of the United States (HSUS, not to be confused with local human society shelters), Animal Liberation Front (ALF), and Animal Protection Institute of America use misleading and often false statements regarding both domestic and exotic animal ownership. All pet owners, not just those who own exotics, need to stick together to protect our rights to own our pets. Remember, animal rights wants to eliminate all animals from homes, zoos, and entertainment. If they continue to pass laws prohibiting ownership, the only result will be the extinction of many animals, such as lions and tigers. Many exotics have few left in the wild, and humans will continue to encroach on their natural habitats. If these exotics were left ONLY in the wild, in a matter of years they would be at or near extinction. Is up to responsible owners and zoological institutions to continue to breed these animals in captivity so that our children will be able to witness first hand the magnificence of these creatures, and not just see them through the pages of an encyclopedia. In the US, importation of endangered species is strictly monitored to prevent the capturing of wild populations. Exotics in the US are captive bred and are in fact contributing to the survival of many species of animals.

Tags: Animal Rights

0 comments View Entry